Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video17 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interfaith Alliance results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including False Dilemma, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 5 hits. Analysis detected 5 faulty-reasoning hits from 17 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,047 of 28,364 speakers). This Interfaith Alliance is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Interfaith Alliance
Speaker details
Total words: 17
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
29.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos17 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.4%29.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 1.5%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos