Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ilana Israel Samuels results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 152 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,984 of 28,364 speakers). This Ilana Israel Samuels is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Ilana Israel Samuels
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510068.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos