Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video85.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Igor Volsky results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.6% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 480.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,996 of 28,364 speakers). This Igor Volsky is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Igor Volsky
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠44%Igor Volsky (selected)28%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 85.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
27.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.6%65.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 46.9%46.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 44.5%44.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.4%23.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.4%23.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 44.5%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos