Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Idalis Vento results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 113 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,898 of 28,364 speakers). This Idalis Vento is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Idalis Vento
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 121
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
13.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos121 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.7%18.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos