Author summary
15% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexa Cimino results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 567 hits . Analysis detected 3,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,139 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,884 of 6,170 authors). This Alexa Cimino is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Alexa Cimino
Author details
Total words: 5,139
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst