Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video184.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ibrahim Le Seul results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 51.6% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 184.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,981 of 28,364 speakers). This Ibrahim Le Seul is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Ibrahim Le Seul
Speaker details
Total words: 184.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
18.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos184.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 51.6%51.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos