Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video31.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Bremmer results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,852 of 28,364 speakers). This Ian Bremmer is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Ian Bremmer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 31.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos