Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Measurement Initiative results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 106 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,852 of 28,364 speakers). This Human Rights Measurement Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Human Rights Measurement Initiative
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos