Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Bagwell results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 884 hits . Analysis detected 5,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,629 of 6,628 authors). This Stephen Bagwell is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Stephen Bagwell
Author details
Total words: 5,496
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst