Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video59.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hoxhunt results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 178 faulty-reasoning hits from 59.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,487 of 28,364 speakers). This Hoxhunt is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Hoxhunt
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 59.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos59.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 48.0%48.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 48.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos