Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos35.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houthi militant group results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 52% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,025 of 28,364 speakers). This Houthi militant group is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Houthi militant group
Speaker details
Total words: 35.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
52.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos35.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 52.0%52.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 52.0%52.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 52.0%52.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos