Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Rockets results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 70.2% saturation with 36.5 hits. Analysis detected 202.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,586 of 28,364 speakers). This Houston Rockets is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Houston Rockets
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
55.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 70.2%70.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 59.6%59.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 59.6%59.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 59.6%59.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.6%59.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 40.4%40.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 70.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 1.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos