Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Police officer results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 189 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,839 of 28,364 speakers). This Houston Police officer is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Houston Police officer
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos