Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video145.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hope Shuler results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Representativeness Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 65 faulty-reasoning hits from 145.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,250 of 28,364 speakers). This Hope Shuler is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Hope Shuler
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 145.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
14.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos145.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos