Speaker summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hochul results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.8% saturation with 56.156 hits. Analysis detected 169.6 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (13,836 of 25,751 speakers). This Hochul is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Hochul
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
29.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.8%46.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.4%30.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.8%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos