Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video137.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ho Chi Minh results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 495 faulty-reasoning hits from 137.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,248 of 28,364 speakers). This Ho Chi Minh is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Ho Chi Minh
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 137.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.3% percentile
42.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos137.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos