Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These @HistorianUSA1 results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,315 of 28,364 speakers). This @HistorianUSA1 is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
@HistorianUSA1
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
58.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 58.1%58.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos