Speaker summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hingham Police department results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (26,950 of 28,364 speakers). This Hingham Police department is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Hingham Police department
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.0% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos176 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos