Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hillsdale College results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 84% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 84% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (5,012 of 28,364 speakers). This Hillsdale College is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Hillsdale College
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
84.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 84.0%84.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 84.0%84.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 84.0%84.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 84.0%84.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 84.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 84.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 84.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 84.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos