'Revolutionary America' Helps Americans Understand Our Heritage 74%

By Brooke Brandtjen87%

7/10/2026, 11:30:57 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 3,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 929 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,637 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the article peer group.

Image Credit Hunter Desportes/ Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 4.0 
As we celebrate 250 years of America, the country needs to return to its founding principles now more than ever. 
Hillsdale College showed this in its first feature-length documentary, Revolutionary America , which walks viewers through the story of America’s inception. 
The documentary begins at the conclusion of the French and Indian War, explaining how the 13 colonies forged a distinct identity apart from Great Britain. 
Between 1763 and 1776, the British government implemented a series of humiliating taxes, prevented settlers from moving west, and limited the colonies’ economic growth for the sake of the monarchy. 
The Founding Fathers saw the Revolution as their moral duty, Revolutionary America explains. 
Through the writings of Hamilton, Jefferson, and Revere, the documentary lays out why the early Americans believed the British government was infringing on their rights. 
Factors like economic suppression and a growing military presence forced the colonies to band together. 
As crisis loomed, municipalities rose up in the face of tyranny, forming local militias and committees to defend themselves against mounting suppression, especially after the Boston Massacre. 
Wealthy men of high social status, such as Robert Morris and George Washington, put their fortunes and reputations on the line to serve what they knew was a noble cause. 
“There is an obsession within the founders and the framers with creating a kind of government that is in accord with nature and with nature’s God,” political commentator Michael Knowles said in the film.. 
“The precise goal of the revolution was to affect their safety and happiness.” 
Revolutionary America contends that the American Revolution was not an accident. 
It was the hard-won result of a courageous, virtuous, and principled people fighting for liberty. 
It proposes that the Revolution and the Constitution are part of the American experiment, which always strives for excellence. 
Hillsdale College President Dr. 
Larry Arnn states in the final moments of the film that: “America is the most generous and beautiful political experience in human history. 
[The founders] set up a standard maximum for a periphery society, always to be striven for, always to be sought after, and never to be wholly attained. 
The Revolution continues.” 
Although we have now passed the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Hillsdale’s documentary serves as a reminder of how important it is that Americans continue to celebrate their country. 
Modern America has a patriotism problem. 
The percentage of Americans who claim that they are “extremely proud” to be an American has sharply declined . 
The steep fall has quickened in recent years. 
In 2021, 43 percent of Americans claimed they were “extremely” proud of their country, while in 2026, only 33 percent are. 
For members of the Democratic party, that percentage is sickeningly low, sitting at a weak 14 percent. 
The national drop in patriotism can be linked to a cultural disrespect for the American Revolution. 
For most of our nation’s history, the Founding Fathers and the men who fought in the Revolutionary War were regarded as heroes. 
Unfortunately, left-wing educational institutions have tried to destroy their legacy. 
Leftists dismiss heroic men like Washington and Jefferson as immoral slave owners while slamming our nation’s founding documents for not meeting modern diversity, equity, and inclusion standards. 
With works such as The 1619 Project and The Great Contradiction: The Tragic Side of the American Founding , writers and intellectuals have attempted to undermine the founders’ historic achievements. 
In addition, there has been a consolidated effort led by left-wing activists to separate American culture from its history. 
Democrats have tried to undermine the value of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. 
Constitution as a way to erode our faith in their principles. 
Far-left groups like the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have made tearing down American traditions a core part of their mission. 
The DSA has stated as much in its own platform, advocating for removing the presidency, the Supreme Court, and the Senate. 
Our constitutional order is under siege. 
Americans can navigate through the turbulent times that lie ahead by emulating the virtues of the Founding Fathers. 
Revolutionary America gives viewers a chance to learn about American exceptionalism from the men who fought, bled, and died so that our nation might exist. 
Our country and its Revolution will only “continue,” as Dr. 
Arnn put it, if we remain students of history. 
In a letter to his son, John Adams once wrote: “You will ever remember that all the end of study is to make you a good man and a useful citizen. 
This will ever be the sum total of the advice of your affectionate father.” 
Brooke Brandtjen is a writer and journalist from Wisconsin who focuses primarily on culture, politics, and religion. 
She is extremely passionate about the arts and history, and is honored to write for a variety of distinguished publications. 
Revolutionary America 
Shop The #FDRLSTSWAG Store 
The Real Citizen Vigilantes Roaming Europe Are Armed Muslims Imposing Sharia Law 
Young Washington Captures The Spirit Of America 
Duty To Disobey Spotlights The Heroes Punished By Biden’s Military Covid Shot Mandate 
Masters Of The Universe Is A Fun Throwback To When Good Guys Were Good And Bad Guys Were Bad 
Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 5 
MIA Mitch McConnell Must Explain His Absence Or Retire 
Increasing Number Of Ivy League Students Can’t Even Read, So Let’s Stop Calling Them ‘Elite’ 
Propaganda Press Buries Illegal Alien’s Alleged Attempt To Run Over ICE Agent Before Fatal Shooting 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.4%Brooke Brandtjen: 4.8%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias16.4%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.6%The Federalist: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 2.1%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.3%The Federalist: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Brooke Brandtjen: 10.6%The Federalist: 10.1%Framing Effect8.1%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.2%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.7%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Brooke Brandtjen: 2.5%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias6.9%This article: 2.8%Brooke Brandtjen: 3.5%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.8%This article: 31.2%Brooke Brandtjen: 11.5%The Federalist: 12.2%Negativity Bias31.2%This article: 8.1%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.2%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.0%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.2%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias3.2%This article: 4.2%Brooke Brandtjen: 3.9%The Federalist: 4.0%In-Group Bias4.2%This article: 14.6%Brooke Brandtjen: 6.3%The Federalist: 2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias14.6%This article: 15.5%Brooke Brandtjen: 9.9%The Federalist: 2.3%Halo Effect15.5%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%Brooke Brandtjen: 2.7%The Federalist: 1.2%Recency Bias8.9%This article: 6.5%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.0%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Brooke Brandtjen: 2.3%The Federalist: 5.3%Ad Hominem12.2%This article: 9.5%Brooke Brandtjen: 6.3%The Federalist: 2.8%Straw Man9.5%This article: 17.5%Brooke Brandtjen: 3.0%The Federalist: 5.1%Appeal to Authority17.5%This article: 3.7%Brooke Brandtjen: 3.6%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 3.7%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.2%The Federalist: 2.2%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 16.0%The Federalist: 11.3%Hasty Generalization17.0%This article: 3.6%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.4%Red Herring3.6%This article: 3.7%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.6%Bandwagon3.7%This article: 22.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 7.8%The Federalist: 8.1%Appeal to Emotion22.0%This article: 4.5%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.2%The Federalist: 3.2%Begging the Question4.5%This article: 7.1%Brooke Brandtjen: 4.0%The Federalist: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 11.1%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.7%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof11.1%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.3%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.7%Anecdotal5.3%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.8%Brooke Brandtjen: 2.7%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.8%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.2%Brooke Brandtjen: 0.9%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy3.2%This article: 8.4%Brooke Brandtjen: 2.7%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 10.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection10.0%This article: 13.7%Brooke Brandtjen: 16.7%The Federalist: 19.9%Biased Writer Voice13.7%This article: 7.8%Brooke Brandtjen: 4.9%The Federalist: 5.3%Indoctrination7.8%This article: 0.0%Brooke Brandtjen: 1.1%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.7%Brooke Brandtjen: 15.0%The Federalist: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias19.7%This article: 9.8%Brooke Brandtjen: 2.4%The Federalist: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.8%

929 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers19%attributed speech748writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageHillsdale College • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageRevolutionary America • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Knowles • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRevolutionary America • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHillsdale College • 4 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Arnn • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDemocratic Socialists of America (DSA) • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Arnn • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Adams • 31 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Adams • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hillsdale College

84%flagged-word coverage
25 attributed words14% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +74.6 ptsWriter: 9.4%Hillsdale College: 84.0%84.0%Politically Right Leaning -24.5 ptsWriter: 24.5%Hillsdale College: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.2 ptsWriter: 15.2%Hillsdale College: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Hillsdale College: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Hillsdale College: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Hillsdale College: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.