Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hillsdale College results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,227 hits. Analysis detected 11,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,680 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (22,151 of 35,675 keywords). This Hillsdale College is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Hillsdale College
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
38%Hillsdale College (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,680
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.9%6.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos