Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hennessy Hernandez results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.5% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 324.117 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (10,270 of 25,928 speakers). This Hennessy Hernandez is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Hennessy Hernandez
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.4% percentile
44.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 65.9%65.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.5%65.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 48.7%48.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.7%48.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 31.9%31.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 65.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 48.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos