Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Henna Virkkunen results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Authority, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 66.375 hits. Analysis detected 372.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 186 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,162 of 28,364 speakers). This Henna Virkkunen is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Henna Virkkunen
Speaker details
Total words: 186
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.9% percentile
18.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos186 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.2%27.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.8%19.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos