Speaker summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 582.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heidi Redd results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Loss Aversion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 392 hits . Analysis detected 929.313 faulty-reasoning hits from 582.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,246 of 28,364 speakers). This Heidi Redd is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Heidi Redd
Speaker details
Total words: 582.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 8.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos582.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 41.8% 41.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst