Speaker summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hector Perez, MD results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 66 hits . Analysis detected 466 faulty-reasoning hits from 371 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,835 of 28,364 speakers). This Hector Perez, MD is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Hector Perez, MD
Speaker details
Total words: 371
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.4% percentile 10.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos371 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst