Speaker summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heath Pickerill results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 102 hits . Analysis detected 485.263 faulty-reasoning hits from 256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,404 of 28,364 speakers). This Heath Pickerill is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Heath Pickerill
Speaker details
Total words: 256
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos256 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 17.5% 17.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 22.2% 22.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst