Speaker summary
⁠52%3 analyzed articles/videos43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health officials results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 83.1% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 49.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,211 of 28,364 speakers). This Health officials is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Health officials
Speaker details
Total words: 43.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
49.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos43.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 83.1%83.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 49.3%49.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Indoctrination: Speaker 83.1%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 49.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos