Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video119.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hatem Al-Mughrabi results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 71% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 408.145 faulty-reasoning hits from 119.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,682 of 28,364 speakers). This Hatem Al-Mughrabi is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Hatem Al-Mughrabi
Speaker details
Total words: 119.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
37.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos119.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 71.0%71.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 51.1%51.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.7%38.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.3%29.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 71.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos