Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maram Humaid results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 2,056 hits. Analysis detected 12,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,691 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,026 of 6,359 authors). This Maram Humaid is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Maram Humaid
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
21%Maram Humaid (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,691
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate