Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haruhiko Kuroda results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 607.023 faulty-reasoning hits from 183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,335 of 28,364 speakers). This Haruhiko Kuroda is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Haruhiko Kuroda
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠29%Haruhiko Kuroda (selected)18%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 183
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
18.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos183 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 9.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos