Speaker summary
ā 69% 1 analyzed article/video 183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haruhiko Kuroda results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 104 hits . Analysis detected 607.023 faulty-reasoning hits from 183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18% and a BS Rank of ā 29% (20,335 of 28,364 speakers). This Haruhiko Kuroda is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Haruhiko Kuroda
Speaker details
Total words: 183
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 18.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos183 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 37.3% 37.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 27.2% 27.2% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 9.1% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst