Speaker summary
69%1 analyzed article/video36.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harry Longinidis results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 36.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 90.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,052 of 37,163 speakers). This Harry Longinidis is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Harry Longinidis
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
84%Harry Longinidis (selected)91%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 36.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
90.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos36.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 70.6%70.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos