Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video55.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hans Torgerson results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 247.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,713 of 28,364 speakers). This Hans Torgerson is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Hans Torgerson
Speaker details
Total words: 55.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
40.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 59.8%59.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 65.2%65.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.6%19.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 65.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 59.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 6.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos