Speaker summary
43%1 analyzed article/video360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hans Johnson results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 490.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,536 of 28,364 speakers). This Hans Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Hans Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.9% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos360 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos