Speaker summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hans Johnson results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 490.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,536 of 28,364 speakers). This Hans Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Hans Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 360
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos360 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 30.0% 30.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Middle Ground: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.3% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst