Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Wiley results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,419 of 28,364 speakers). This Hannah Wiley is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Hannah Wiley
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
75.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos