Speaker summary
ā 95%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Sabio-Howell results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 33 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 94% (1,743 of 28,364 speakers). This Hannah Sabio-Howell is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Hannah Sabio-Howell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 94%Hannah Sabio-Howell (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos