Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video37.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Gomez Faria results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 94.9% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 142.999 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 92.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,852 of 28,364 speakers). This Hannah Gomez Faria is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Hannah Gomez Faria
Speaker details
Total words: 37.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
92.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 94.7%94.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 94.9%94.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 89.7%89.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 89.7%89.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 94.9%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 94.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 89.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 89.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos