How a group of crabbing baddies became SF’s most unexpected support group 28%

7/13/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 1,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 722 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,831 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the article peer group.

How a group of crabbing baddies became SF’s most unexpected support group 
Two laid-off friends built a 7,000-follower crabbing community for women and non-binary people to learn how to catch crab. 
Photos and text by Giselle Garza Lerma 
Published Jul. 13, 2026 at 6:00am 
Email (opens in new tab) 
Twitter (opens in new tab) 
Bluesky (opens in new tab) 
Facebook (opens in new tab) 
LinkedIn (opens in new tab) 
Telegram (opens in new tab) 
WhatsApp (opens in new tab) 
Reddit (opens in new tab) 
You may have seen videos circulating on Instagram and TikTok of a group of baddies at Torpedo Wharf casting reels, slamming beers, and somehow still managing to catch crabs. 
The club was founded by two friends, Lissa Koelzer and Hannah Gomez Faria, who lost their jobs in 2025 and were looking for a hobby to make the best of their free time. 
On Christmas Eve, Koelzer asked Faria if she wanted to try out crabbing. 
They filmed a TikTok of them testing the waters, and next thing you know, the Baddies Who Crab was born. 
They gained over 7,000 followers on Instagram in a span of four months, acquired over 500 WhatsApp members, and garnered waitlists hundreds of names long on Partiful for their meetups. 
A drop net set with a salmon head and canned fish as bait. 
Koelzer and Faria host crabbing get-togethers at Torpedo Wharf, helping women and non-binary folks of all backgrounds learn how to crab fish. 
It’s free to join; no experience is needed. 
“What we do is we make a safe place to make mistakes,” Koelzer said “Hannah and I are not guides by any means. 
We’re all figuring it out together, and I think because of that, it’s way less intimidating.” 
While Baddies Who Crab is a community ranging from beginners to experienced crab-catchers, respecting the fishing community is a top priority. 
Before they officially begin crabbing, they remind the attendees of the rules and regulations of the water, what crabs to keep, fishing etiquette, and end with a Crabby Baddie chant and drink. 
Baddies Who Crab founders Lissa Koelzer, left, and Hannah Gomez Farias unwittingly found themselves presiding over a community of hundreds of crab-catchers. 
Gomez Farias shows a curious family the rock crab she caught at Torpedo Wharf this past weekend. 
The founders have said they’re open to criticism and feedback. 
They were told by the fishing community that they had too many people on the dock, so they narrowed it down from 30 to 20 participants, hence the Partiful RSVP list. 
They have also drawn some detractors online, with people accusing them of breaking the law or not following Fish and Wildlife regulations. 
On the contrary, when The Standard joined a meetup on Saturday, a Fish and Game Warden patrolling the dock commended the Baddies Who Crab for introducing people “into a different sporting world, particularly communities that have not been properly represented in the past.” 
Gomez Farias holds Nikita Siahaan’s catch of the day on Sunday. 
As the Crabby Baddies expands, the group has introduced captains to lead chapters outside San Francisco. 
“I started getting messages like, ‘I have been in the bay for years and I’ve really struggled to find my kind of people, and I finally found it. 
Thank you for creating this space,’” Koelzer said. 
“The loneliness epidemic is so real, and the fact that Hannah and I are actually making an impact  I think that’s what we’ve been surprised by above all else,” she added. 
Koelzer and event participants share a laugh on Torpedo Wharf on Sunday. 
Nikita Siahaan teaches a participant how to cast a rod. 
So how can you become a Crabby Baddie? 
Meetup announcements are made on Instagram, at @crabbybaddiessf (opens in new tab) , where there’s a link to a form to sign up for the WhatsApp group. 
The WhatsApp chat, meanwhile, includes 14 channels 
As far as gear, the group has a bring-your-own-equipment policy  so come prepared. 
Faria recommended going to the woman-owned Gus’ Discount Fishing Tackle shop on Balboa Street in the Outer Richmond, where Faria bought her first rod and snare Faria describes the proprietor, Stephanie Ernst-Scott, as the “O.G. 
Crabby Baddie.” 
Thu Do catches crabs with her drop net. 
Culture Events Outdoors 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.0%The San Francisco Standard: 2.7%Confirmation Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%The San Francisco Standard: 3.5%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.0%This article: 4.2%The San Francisco Standard: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.2%This article: 5.5%The San Francisco Standard: 6.8%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.8%The San Francisco Standard: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%The San Francisco Standard: 2.7%Optimism Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%The San Francisco Standard: 7.2%Negativity Bias7.1%This article: 6.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 4.3%The San Francisco Standard: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error4.3%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%The San Francisco Standard: 0.8%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%The San Francisco Standard: 3.9%Halo Effect8.2%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%The San Francisco Standard: 1.3%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.0%The San Francisco Standard: 3.3%Appeal to Authority6.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 5.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.5%The San Francisco Standard: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion15.5%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.5%The San Francisco Standard: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.5%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.2%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Composition/Division4.2%This article: 9.0%The San Francisco Standard: 3.4%Anecdotal9.0%This article: 2.9%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.9%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection4.0%This article: 3.3%The San Francisco Standard: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice3.3%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The San Francisco Standard: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%The San Francisco Standard: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.9%

722 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers21%attributed speech571writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGiselle Garza Lerma • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLissa Koelzer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLissa Koelzer • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLissa Koelzer • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLissa Koelzer • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLissa Koelzer • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageHannah Gomez Faria • 35 words • 100.0% coverageHannah Gomez Faria • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hannah Gomez Faria

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words25% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +90.2 ptsWriter: 9.8%Hannah Gomez Faria: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Hannah Gomez Faria: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Hannah Gomez Faria: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.