Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video106.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanan Abu Muslim results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 200.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,642 of 28,364 speakers). This Hanan Abu Muslim is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Hanan Abu Muslim
Speaker details
Total words: 106.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
25.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos106.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 56.3%56.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 28.2%28.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.8%21.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 56.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos