Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video12 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamka results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 9 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 12 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,702 of 28,364 speakers). This Hamka is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Hamka
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 12
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos12 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos