Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamish Vickers results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 76.1% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 197.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,449 of 28,364 speakers). This Hamish Vickers is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Hamish Vickers
Speaker details
Total words: 61.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
41.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 76.1%76.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 51.1%51.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 76.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 51.1%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 2.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos