Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ham El-Wally results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.5% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (14,107 of 25,877 speakers). This Ham El-Wally is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Ham El-Wally
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
28.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.5%38.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos