Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 477 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,715 of 28,364 speakers). This Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510094.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos