Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gugliotti results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 49% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,484 of 28,364 speakers). This Gugliotti is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Gugliotti
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
23.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 49.0%49.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 49.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos