Author summary
19%3 analyzed articles/videos1,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonah Meadows results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 2,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,380 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (5,060 of 6,628 authors). This Jonah Meadows is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Jonah Meadows
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
24%Jonah Meadows (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,380
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos