Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos105.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grisel Ruiz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 301 faulty-reasoning hits from 105.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 58.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,203 of 28,364 speakers). This Grisel Ruiz is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Grisel Ruiz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
58.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos105.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.6%50.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos