Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gregory Berber results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Anecdotal, and Anchoring Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 274.474 faulty-reasoning hits from 254 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (22,455 of 26,722 speakers). This Gregory Berber is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Gregory Berber
Speaker details
Total words: 254
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
12.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos254 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.4%21.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos