Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video54.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gregg Amore results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54.5 hits. Analysis detected 166.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (9,986 of 26,865 speakers). This Gregg Amore is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Gregg Amore
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
47.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 34.6%34.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.6%34.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.6%34.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.6%34.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 26.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos