Author summary
77%1 analyzed article/video693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Milkovits results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,079 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,595 of 6,318 authors). This Amanda Milkovits is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Amanda Milkovits
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
75%Amanda Milkovits (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,079
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510074.8% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 15.3%15.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 20.0%20.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 13.6%13.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 15.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos