Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video162.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Hardeman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 217.277 faulty-reasoning hits from 162.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,853 of 28,364 speakers). This Greg Hardeman is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Greg Hardeman
Speaker details
Total words: 162.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos162.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos