Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos54.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Brockman results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Halo Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 78.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,749 of 28,364 speakers). This Greg Brockman is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Greg Brockman
Speaker details
Total words: 54.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
40.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos54.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 78.7%78.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.3%21.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 78.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos